4 Jun 2013
律政司司長 對 鮑展鴻
- Citation
- 律政司司長 對 鮑展鴻
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAAR5/2012
The Court held the trial judge did not err in finding the recorded interview voluntary and admissible; there was no material contradiction undermining the investigator's credibility. On sentence review the Court found the original 220-hour community service order was a principled error given the gravity of accepting advantages totalling about HK$1,119,001 and established authorities requiring deterrent sentences for corruption; the service order was quashed and substituted with imprisonment of three years on each count to run concurrently.