20 Jul 2012
CCA v. NPCA
- Citation
- CCA v. NPCA
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC1447/2007
Applying s.11 MPPO the court assessed maintenance afresh. The court rejected Husband's application to vary P's maintenance downward because the relocation was ordered as temporary, there was insufficient evidence P's stay in Hong Kong was permanent and child’s best interests required oversight; the court adopted a 50/50 apportionment of household/general expenses (rejecting Wife's new one‑third method), upheld Wife's justification to retain the domestic helper for T and refused to reduce T's maintenance on that basis, required Husband to pay reasonable travel costs for Wife to exercise recipr…