25 Jul 2013
BRISTLE LTD v. WONG TSUI CHING VENISA AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- BRISTLE LTD v. WONG TSUI CHING VENISA AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA854/2012
Leave to appeal was refused because the plaintiff had no right to use the common parts as access, reliance on Part VIA was misconceived as s 34I could only be exercised by an owners' committee which did not exist, s 34C did not assist absent s 34I, and the breach was unlawful and not subject to approval, waiver or acquiescence such that there was no serious question to be tried.