16 Mar 2005
WANG DIN SHIN v. NINA KUNG
- Citation
- WANG DIN SHIN v. NINA KUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV275/2004
Leave to appeal was refused because the purportedly general questions were not central to the Court of Appeal's decision, which turned on practical, case‑specific circumstances — principally that there was no realistic prospect of resolving the removal application before determination of the probate proceedings and intervening stays had addressed the practical risk — and because pursuing the motion would be an unjustified waste of costs and resources; indemnity costs were ordered against the applicant.