24 Aug 2020
SC v. OE1 AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2065
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT48/2019
The tribunal could not rely on Article 33(1)(a) to correct non‑clerical omissions, but the Licence and injunctive claims had been presented in the arbitration and were omitted from the dispositive part of the Award; accordingly the tribunal was entitled under Article 33(3) to make an additional award to address those claims. The Addendum therefore validly corrected and supplemented the Award; the setting aside application failed and enforcement of the Award as amended is allowed; later additional grounds not raised in the setting aside application were waived and rejected.