4 Feb 1977
TIN HING LEATHER CO (A FIRM) v. MIN MIN SHOES CO (A FIRM)
- Citation
- TIN HING LEATHER CO (A FIRM) v. MIN MIN SHOES CO (A FIRM)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA3/1976
The appeal was allowed because the cheques were bearer instruments and therefore indorsement by Luen Kee was unnecessary; alternatively, even if indorsement were necessary, the evidence including an admission established that the endorser was the proprietor of Luen Kee, so the adjudicator erred in overlooking that admission.