13 May 2024
Because the applicant expressly withdrew the leave application and there were no outstanding matters, the proper order was to dismiss the application for leave rather than leave the action at large, applying the Court of Appeal decision in Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471.
3 Jan 2024
The applicant voluntarily withdrew the application and confirmed there was nothing outstanding; applying the Court of Appeal precedent in Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471, the appropriate disposal was to dismiss the leave application.
3 Jan 2024
Because the applicant applied to withdraw the leave application and there was nothing outstanding, the court dismissed the leave application, following the authority of Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471 that dismissal is the proper disposition in such circumstances.
27 Sept 2023
Leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed because the applicant effectively withdrew her application and there was nothing outstanding; the Court of Appeal authority in Re Manik mandates dismissal in such circumstances rather than leaving the action at large.
21 Sept 2023
Because the applicant expressly withdrew her application by affirmation and there was nothing outstanding, the court followed Re Manik and dismissed the application for leave to apply for judicial review.
2 Aug 2023
Because the applicant expressly withdrew his application and there was nothing outstanding, the court correctly dismissed the leave application in accordance with Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471 rather than leaving the action at large.
23 Jun 2023
The applicant voluntarily withdrew her application for leave to apply for judicial review; applying the authority in Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi the proper disposal was to dismiss the application as nothing remained outstanding.
23 Jan 2019
The applicant failed to show exceptional circumstances to justify judicial review of the Director's decisions and failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on the merits; the Board and the Director are the proper primary decision-makers for non-refoulement claims and had lawfully evaluated the evidence; leave to apply for judicial review is refused.