2 Apr 2019
HKSAR v. YIP PO LAM (葉寶琳), WONG KAN YUEN (黃根源)
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFA 13
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC54/2018
Applications for leave to appeal were dismissed because none of the points raised were reasonably arguable: AI s11 is directed to legitimate aims and satisfies the proportionality test; conviction under s20(b)/AI s11 does not require proof of actual disruption nor both a failure to behave and a failure to comply with directions; and bail jurisdiction under s34 HKCFAO does not arise until an applicant takes the procedural step to apply for leave to appeal.