22 Jul 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 劉熾楠
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1719
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA85/2019
The trial judge confined her findings to conduct when the appellant was present and did not rely on out‑of‑court declarations as co‑conspirator evidence; she made a detailed assessment of witness credibility, accepted PW1’s account and the minor inconsistencies did not amount to a material error. There was no obvious or material error warranting appellate intervention, so the convictions and sentences were upheld.