5 Sept 2016
HKSAR v. LAM KING SING
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LAM KING SING
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC285/2015
Extension of time to seek leave to appeal conviction refused because the applicant's explanation for delay was implausible and contradicted by contemporaneous documents and he had no arguable grounds; convictions sustained because overwhelming circumstantial and forensic evidence established he was the driver and Pol 571 admission was unnecessary to conviction; leave to appeal sentence refused because the sentence fell within a proper range given very high blood alcohol level, dangerous conduct, and limited mitigation.