15 Nov 2016
HKSAR v. MUSHTAQ ZEESHAN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. MUSHTAQ ZEESHAN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC394/2015
No real possibility of bias existed despite prior appellate comments; the prosecution's primary facts (broken key/half key found in lock, arrest at doorway, personal photographs displayed, fingerprints on mirror and on LV box containing drugs, visible drugs and paraphernalia) were capable of supporting reasonable inferences of occupancy and possession such that there was a case to answer; the trial judge correctly excluded proof of prior acquittal and correctly refused disclosure of the informant because the defence did not show disclosure was necessary to demonstrate innocence; directions on…