3 May 2004
CHAN SHU MING ANDY v. HKSAR
- Citation
- CHAN SHU MING ANDY v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC55/2003
Leave to appeal was refused because the grounds were not reasonably arguable: the taped conversations were not admitted or relied upon as previous consistent statements in support of the witness's in‑court evidence but used to illustrate reactions; the trial judge provided detailed reasons for accepting the witness which the Court of Appeal affirmed; discrepancies in credit card receipts did not undermine the overall credibility given independent evidence of payments and false invoices; no substantial and grave injustice was shown.