22 Apr 2020
HKSAR v. MOK CHUN YIN
- Citation
- [2020] HKCA 231
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC144/2018
The September 2013 incident evidence was properly admissible and relevant to the breakdown of the relationship and the applicant's purpose in attending on the deceased; the trial judge's directions on differences between the VRI and trial evidence, and on PW9's evidence, were legally correct and in fact more favourable to the defence than required; issues of PW9's sobriety and timing were matters for jury determination. Consequently the applicant's convictions and trial were not vitiated and leave to appeal was refused.