27 Sept 1996
FORTUNA APPARELS LTD. v. MEGA STYLE LTD. and Another
- Citation
- FORTUNA APPARELS LTD. v. MEGA STYLE LTD. and Another
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL173/1995
The defence raised by the 1st defendant, while shadowy and containing inherent improbabilities and material documentary contradictions (notably October 1993 minutes), was not shown to be wholly incredible; therefore unconditional summary judgment would be inappropriate. However, the defence was sufficiently suspect to justify conditional leave to defend provided the 1st defendant pays into court the claimed invoice balance of US$145,413.86 within 30 days; applications under Order 27 and for interim payment under Order 29 were dismissed because judgment on admissions was inappropriate and the…