2 Jul 1991
RE SUM TAT MAN
- Citation
- RE SUM TAT MAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3346/1990
The application for judicial review was dismissed because the Adjudicating Officer heard and addressed the inconsistencies and credibility issues, the evidence before him was reasonably capable of supporting the disciplinary findings, the assessment of demeanour and weight was a matter for the tribunal and not for the reviewing court, and there was no demonstrable unfairness or legal error amounting to Wednesbury unreasonableness or perversity that would justify quashing the decisions.