24 Jan 2008
RAJ KUMAR MAHAJAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- RAJ KUMAR MAHAJAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA954/2005
D2 and D3 are proper or necessary parties within Order 11 r1(1)(c) and there is a serious question to be tried against them; the 1st defendant's admission that it was the employer does not preclude alternative pleadings or bind the plaintiff; accordingly the plaintiff's appeal is allowed and the court would, if necessary, grant leave for substituted service of the Amended Statement of Claim on D2 and D3.