2 Jan 1987
LO KA CHUN v. LO TO AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LO KA CHUN v. LO TO AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV44/1985
The court declined to exercise the Slip Rule because there was no accidental slip; it held the 16 October 1985 order was intended to preserve only the costs relating to the applications dealt with by Clough, J and not the general costs of the action, and directed that the general costs of the action be taxed and payable at the conclusion of the restored action.