28 Dec 2018
LI PING CHUN AND ANOTHER v. LIANG TONGHUA AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2757
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2239/2017
The court found the plaintiffs had a good arguable proprietary claim under s60 CPO because the timing and terms of the assignments to HW and KW were suspicious, went beyond the pleaded claims in earlier proceedings, involved nil consideration and occurred after judgment and interim orders; therefore the interim Mareva injunction and asset preservation order should continue to preserve assets pending determination, but the injunctions against HW and KW must be limited to restraint of dealing with the two Properties; asset disclosure should be ordered against TH only.