2 Dec 2016
CWG v. MH AND OTHERS
- Citation
- CWG v. MH AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP643/2012
The court exercised its discretion to lift any implied undertaking as to the two anonymised judgments for limited use in the specified bankruptcy/enforcement proceedings because (1) the judgments were already anonymised and PD15.15 contemplates publication subject to redaction, (2) enforcement of the Costs Order is a legitimate, non-collateral purpose, (3) the Applying Rs offered strict undertakings limiting use and access, and (4) no sufficient prejudice to opposing parties was shown; release approved subject to undertakings and cost orders.