19 Dec 1995
AARON PATRICK NATTRASS v. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
- Citation
- AARON PATRICK NATTRASS v. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2337/1995
The judge's ruling to discharge himself was amenable to judicial review; the correct test is the 'real danger' test from R v Gough and, when a judge assesses his own possible unconscious bias, he may permissibly consider whether an informed and fair observer would think there was a real danger, but that observer's view is only a factor not the decisive test; Judge Caird misapplied the test by giving conclusive weight to the appearance to an observer and by treating the mere fact of an application to recuse as a permissible basis to recuse; therefore the ruling was quashed and mandamus ordered…