10 Jun 2014
TCWF v. LKKS
- Citation
- TCWF v. LKKS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV154/2012
Leave to appeal was refused because the questions advanced were either fact‑specific, premised on incorrect factual assumptions, not of sufficient general or public importance, raised issues not properly arguable on the existing record (including new grounds not argued below), or concerned matters (such as referral to the DPP) that are not properly the subject of appellate review; consequently none of the proposed questions satisfied the threshold for leave and the Notices of Motion were dismissed with costs.