12 Feb 2019
RE PUNO MARIEROL MONTASES
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 130
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV344/2018
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b), raised points that were new or case‑specific and not argued previously, and her asserted risk of harm on return was unarguable; therefore the statutory requirement for leave was not satisfied.