20 Dec 2005
ERICSSON LTD AND ANOTHER v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES AND OTHERS
- Citation
- ERICSSON LTD AND ANOTHER v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL2/2000
On the balance of probabilities both thefts were committed with inside involvement of HACTL employees; the AWC/Guadalajara do not preclude concurrent common law claims against servants/agents; the writ indorsements were broad enough to stop time under Article 29; accordingly Article 25 intent is satisfied so Article 22 monetary limits do not apply as against KLM (actual carrier), ASG Sweden (contracting carrier) and HACTL (agent), and HACTL is not entitled to invoke Article 22 or Article 25A; contractual indemnities and contribution relief were ordered in favour of KLM and ASG Sweden against…