7 Apr 2022
Leave was refused because the applicant failed to identify any arguable legal or procedural error by the Adjudicator; the Adjudicator's factual findings were open to him, the applicant produced no evidentiary support on key issues and there was no realistic prospect of success.
4 Dec 2018
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant did not identify any arguable ground of unlawfulness, unreasonableness or procedural unfairness, the Adjudicator and TCAB applied the correct legal principles and procedure, the applicant failed to establish the requisite real or substantial risk on return, and there was no realistic prospect of success for judicial review after the TCAB rehearing.
16 Nov 2018
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the Applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable legal or procedural error; the Adjudicator conducted a proper rehearing, assessed credibility and evidence fairly, the findings were open to her on the facts and there was no realistic prospect of success on judicial review.
1 Nov 2018
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable grounds of unlawfulness, unreasonableness or procedural unfairness; the Adjudicator conducted a lawful rehearing, applied the correct legal tests and reached a determination that was open on the facts; the Director's decision is not reviewable after the TCAB rehearing.
5 Sept 2018
The court refused leave because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable ground of legal error, unreasonableness or procedural unfairness; the Director and Adjudicator lawfully assessed the evidence and resolved credibility issues, their conclusions were open on the facts and there was no realistic prospect of success on judicial review.