9 Nov 2000
ROSSLYN SERVICES LTD. v. MILIBOW ASSETS LTD. AND OTHERS
- Citation
- ROSSLYN SERVICES LTD. v. MILIBOW ASSETS LTD. AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA3994/2000
The disclosure and variation applications were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the documents sought were company books/records under BVI s.67, clause 11 did not entitle the plaintiff to the documents for the asserted purpose, and the plaintiff failed to satisfy the pre-requisites for court-ordered discovery under Order 24 rule 7; Order 29 did not provide jurisdiction to order the disclosure sought. The time extension was granted for 14 days and costs awarded to the 1st and 2nd defendants with a certificate for senior counsel.