16 Jun 2017
LUCKY POWER LTD v. LAM, PHILIP YUNG TAK and/or other occupiers AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LUCKY POWER LTD v. LAM, PHILIP YUNG TAK and/or other occupiers AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3331/2016
Leave to appeal was refused because the notices and affirmations raised no question of great general or public importance as required by s22(1)(b) Cap 484, and the Court properly exercised its discretion to refuse extension of time given long unexplained delay, lack of merit in the intended appeal, prejudice to the other party and inadmissible late evidence; additionally Mr Lam had no authority to represent the 2nd defendant so his summonses were not validly made on its behalf.