9 Jul 2009
CHENG WING HONG v. YEUNG PING CHIU
- Citation
- CHENG WING HONG v. YEUNG PING CHIU
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2355/2008
Particulars relating to paragraphs 6 and 7 are irrelevant to the sole issue of whether the withdrawals were authorized and are therefore declined; paragraph 12 is the core defence and must be particularised only to the extent necessary to identify for each alleged purpose (reimbursement, purchases, exclusive profit) the type and purpose of expenditure/purchase, total amounts by type, and, for alleged exclusive profits, the total amount and when and how they were made; mode of withdrawal is irrelevant and denied.