28 Mar 1995
DEAK PERERA FAR EAST LTD. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.
- Citation
- DEAK PERERA FAR EAST LTD. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV23/1994
The Court of Appeal held that the amended paragraph 26 gave sufficient particularity—alleging actual knowledge and alternatives of wilful blindness and failure to inquire—to inform Chase of the case it had to meet and therefore paragraph 26 should not have been struck out; constructive knowledge alone is inadequate but the pleaded facts raised a strong inference of the alleged knowledge and justified allowing amendment and discovery.