20 Sept 2019
TRANSUNION LTD v. HONGKONG TAIJIN INDUSTRY LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2437
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1353/2019
The court was satisfied that service on the 1st Batch of defendants was effective despite a clerical error, that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient merits and an inferable risk of dissipation to justify continuation of the proprietary and Mareva elements of the 2nd Injunction, and that the balance of convenience favoured continuation; the fact the transfer to D33 was to a Shanghai branch did not invalidate the injunction on these facts; limited relief was granted to D36 to comply with discovery in aid within seven days.