Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Basic law article 85 (judicial immunity)

Legal area

Court

25 Aug 2025

梁中平對易庭暉陳偉健律師事務所及另四人

Citation

[2025] HKCFI 3730
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCMP2158/2024

The strike out applications are allowed because each writ is disorderly, unintelligible and fails to disclose reasonable causes of action; allegations are malicious, frivolous and vexatious; claims against judicial officers are struck out as incompatible with Basic Law Article 85; an interim costs order on an indemnity basis and a temporary restrictive litigation order are justified given the plaintiff's litigation conduct.
9 Jun 2025

梁中平對易庭暉陳偉健律師事務所及另二人

Citation

[2025] HKCFI 2238
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCMP1536/2024

The court struck out the originating processes in HCMP 1085/2024, 1098/2024, 1254/2024 and 1536/2024 because the pleadings failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action, were malicious, frivolous and an abuse of court process amounting to vexatious litigation, and the claims asserted against judicial officers were barred by judicial immunity under Basic Law Article 85; accordingly strike‑out relief and an interim costs order were made.
9 Jun 2025

梁中平對張世文蔡敏律師事務所及另一人

Citation

[2025] HKCFI 2238
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCMP1085/2024

The court struck out the four originating processes because each failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action, contained unsupported and scandalous allegations amounting to abuse of process and vexatious litigation, and because the claims against the two presiding officers were barred by Basic Law Article 85; accordingly the strike‑out applications succeed and an interim costs order was made with a procedure for submissions and assessment.

Hong Kong Case Law

梁中平 對 易庭暉陳偉健律師事務所及另四人

梁中平 對 易庭暉陳偉健律師事務所及另二人

梁中平 對 張世文蔡敏律師事務所及另一人

梁中平對易庭暉陳偉健律師事務所及另四人

梁中平對易庭暉陳偉健律師事務所及另二人

梁中平對張世文蔡敏律師事務所及另一人