8 Dec 2003
LAM SUM PO v. KAM FAI ELECTROPLATING FACTORY LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- LAM SUM PO v. KAM FAI ELECTROPLATING FACTORY LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCW534/2000
On the evidence the petitioner was a nominee shareholder with no beneficial interest in the company shares and therefore lacked locus to bring a s.168A petition; alternatively, even if beneficial ownership were assumed, the petitioner failed to prove unfairly prejudicial conduct by the respondents given petitioner’s misconduct, lawful corporate acts and objective justification for directors’ remuneration; petition dismissed with costs.