22 May 1995
WOO TURHAN and Another v. TAIWAN FUJI TRADING (HK) LTD.
- Citation
- WOO TURHAN and Another v. TAIWAN FUJI TRADING (HK) LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP168/1995
The court held the DMC was defectively executed because it did not comply with the company articles requiring the prescribed attestation; because the DMC was central to proof of title and allocation of shares the vendor failed to prove good title and did not satisfactorily answer requisitions, the plaintiffs were entitled to the declarations and relief sought including interest, agent fees and costs.