14 Apr 1994
Chan Kong Tit and Others v. THE DIRECTOR OFIMMIGRATION
- Citation
- Chan Kong Tit and Others v. THE DIRECTOR OFIMMIGRATION
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV163/1993
The appeal is dismissed because (1) the Bill of Rights cannot be invoked against the Director's exercise of immigration powers due to the section 11 exemption as affirmed in Hai Ho Tak, and (2) Hong Kong's policy of accepting 75 one-way permits per day and the fact that the PRC selects recipients does not constitute an unlawful delegation or an unreasonable exercise of immigration control; accordingly the Director's Removal Order was lawful.