7 Mar 2011
AU YEUNG YEE MAN v. WAN PO JUN MARY PAULINE
- Citation
- AU YEUNG YEE MAN v. WAN PO JUN MARY PAULINE
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV208/2009
Leave to appeal was refused because the defendant's claim based on breach of promise to marry is governed by LARCO s.23, the proposed issue of amending s.23 is a legislative matter not suitable for judicial determination, and there was no arguable point of public or general importance to justify granting leave.