17 Jun 2008
LIM HAU CHUN AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Citation
- LIM HAU CHUN AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC17/2008
Leave to appeal was refused because the trial judge's directions, including a Ghosh direction on dishonesty and directions as to intent to cause economic loss, were adequate; the claim of right did not require additional direction; a Brown direction was unnecessary as the charge and evidence indicated detriment to all interested persons; there was no basis to displace Ghosh with Peters; and the 2nd applicant's sentence did not involve substantial and grave injustice.