22 Feb 2008
HKSAR v. TAI CHI WAH AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. TAI CHI WAH AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC497/2006
No Brown direction was required because there was no realistic risk of the jury being inconsistent on essential ingredients given the all-or-nothing factual dispute whether work was done; the judge's directions on dishonesty, economic risk and issues for the jury were adequate; consequently convictions and the second applicant's sentence were affirmed.