21 Dec 2009
THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF YUE TIN COURT v. CHANG SHENG KAI
- Citation
- THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF YUE TIN COURT v. CHANG SHENG KAI
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ6156/2006
The plaintiff's substantive claim was dismissed because the demand and registration procedure under Clause 6(f) of the DMC was not complied with and the defendants had caused or instructed release of the Building Safety Loan so no proper outstanding sum existed; breaches of the procurement Code at best rendered the contract voidable but it had not been set aside and did not relieve owners of contribution liability; interest claims, if any, were for a sum within Small Claims Tribunal jurisdiction.