29 Oct 1996
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV137/1996
The appeals were dismissed because the appellant failed to present material facts establishing a meritorious defence or to displace the statutory presumption created by s33(8) of the Buildings Ordinance; therefore the default judgments were properly maintained.