17 Nov 2000
ALCATEL CABLE CONTRACTING NORWAY AS AND ANOTHER v. TITAN LOGISTIC(S) PTE LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- ALCATEL CABLE CONTRACTING NORWAY AS AND ANOTHER v. TITAN LOGISTIC(S) PTE LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL259/1996
The court declined the Bullock indemnity because plaintiffs had targeted both defendants and there was no basis to require the 1st defendant to pick up the 2nd defendant's costs; however the court exercised its discretion to certify the case fit for two counsel for taxation purposes, subject to temporal limitation that costs for counsel before 1 July 1998 be limited to junior counsel only, and ordered plaintiffs to pay the costs of the 2nd defendant's summons to be taxed if not agreed.