14 Oct 2016
WADDINGTON LTD v. CHAN CHUN HOO THOMAS AND OTHERS
- Citation
- WADDINGTON LTD v. CHAN CHUN HOO THOMAS AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV10/2014
Leave to appeal was refused because the questions posed were fact‑dependent and not questions of great public importance. The Court of Appeal found no credible evidence that the third party (Yugang) would not have purchased from Profit Point; the no conflict rule remains fact‑sensitive and established principles were applied correctly; and causation was properly assessed by finding Profit Point lost an opportunity flowing from D1's breach using the equitable but‑for test with common sense. The application therefore did not raise points of general public importance warranting leave.