26 Feb 2003
HKSAR v. CHING LONG TIN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHING LONG TIN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA858/2002
Magistrate's acceptance of PW1's credible evidence together with the uncontradicted chronology and security evidence permitted the only reasonable inference that the appellant was the person who stood on the toilet to look over the partition and that his conduct (tarrying/peering) showed intent or caused reasonable concern; the cautioned statement warranted little weight; accordingly the conviction was upheld.