28 Jul 2020
TYT v. TLH
- Citation
- [2020] HKFC 153
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCJA3690/2017
The court found the s17(3) presumption rebutted: Wife credibly demonstrated she genuinely believed she would be the ultimate payee and disclosed the dispositions; Husband failed to prove he would be granted financial provision because his valuation of the disputed shares was unsustainable and evidence showed the shares and proceeds were beneficially Husband's or otherwise misvalued; there was therefore no proper basis to grant an injunction against the daughter as a non-party; post-hearing evidence was admitted because it corrected an indisputable factual error (misapplication of share consol…