15 Sept 2017
顧明 對 阮夏君
- Citation
- 顧明 對 阮夏君
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA3341/2016
The appeal is dismissed because the plaintiff failed to show a reasonable cause: the property transfer predated the divorce and could not support the alleged deception; he was represented, signed the agreement and the judge explained the consent; allegations of non-disclosure were not pleaded with particulars or shown to be material relative to the parties' assets and the parties had agreed to dispense with further financial disclosure; child custody claims are outside the scope of the consent-order challenge.