31 Oct 2016
TAHIR KASHIF v. SAFDAR NASAR MAHMUD
- Citation
- TAHIR KASHIF v. SAFDAR NASAR MAHMUD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC1763/2011
Leave to adduce the proposed orthopaedic expert was refused because the applicant failed to show the expert was necessary: the central disputes were factual and credibility issues (whether the injury occurred in the course of employment or from a traffic accident), existing contemporaneous medical evidence and witness statements already addressed nature of the injury, and permitting the expert would delay the case and increase costs contrary to active case management under the Civil Justice Reforms.