Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Companies ordinance section 114b

Legal area

Court

26 Mar 2003

LAW KA SANG JACQUELINE v. TREASURE PATH DEVELOPMENT LTD

Citation

LAW KA SANG JACQUELINE v. TREASURE PATH DEVELOPMENT LTD
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCMP921/2003

The court granted the applicant leave under section 114B to convene an extraordinary general meeting within 14 days to pass a special resolution to change the Company's Chinese name because strict compliance with the Articles' quorum and 21-day notice requirement was impracticable in light of the Registrar's 30-day deadline following restoration, and the respondent did not oppose the application.
7 Mar 2003

YEUNG WEI SUNG v. LAI CHOR PROFITS LTD AND ANOTHER

Citation

YEUNG WEI SUNG v. LAI CHOR PROFITS LTD AND ANOTHER
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCMP5059/2002

The court exercised its discretion under s114B of the Companies Ordinance to order that an extraordinary general meeting be called and conducted and to direct that one member present in person or by proxy shall be deemed to constitute a meeting because it was impracticable to hold a meeting (a shareholder could not be located), proper notice had been given, and a decision was necessary for the company to determine whether to extend the joint venture and to raise capital.