6 Jan 2000
C v. C
- Citation
- C v. C
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC1991/1995
Leave refused because, at the time of the application, the husband had no legal entitlement to property in possession or reversion: the former matrimonial home had been resumed extinguishing title and the proposed government grant/compensation had not vested and did not constitute a possessory or reversionary interest; therefore the wife lacked a reasonable prospect of obtaining a S6 transfer order and the application was premature.