27 Jun 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 張榮志
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 張榮志
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA624/2011
The appellate court held there was no basis to disturb the trial judge's credibility findings: the first prosecution witness gave clear and consistent evidence on the key facts, the second witness's conduct in not cautioning was reasonably explained and not improper, and the trial judge reasonably excluded the third witness's inconsistent evidence; therefore the conviction for careless driving was safe and was upheld.