22 Aug 1995
R. v. CHEUNG KA FAI & OTHERS
- Citation
- R. v. CHEUNG KA FAI & OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC198/1992
The intercepted telephone conversations were admissible as relevant and cogent evidence; the Hong Kong Bill of Rights (s.6(1)) does not empower a trial judge to exclude evidence admissible under established common law evidence rules on the ground of alleged privacy interference; the conjugal unity rule did not preclude conviction because the conspiracy involved persons in addition to the spouse; the summing-up was adequate and the convictions stand.