5 Aug 1999
HKSAR v. CHAN MING KUEN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAN MING KUEN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA530/1999
The phrase "personal use" in s.2(c) must be given a broad construction to include personal property retained for personal use even if shared with others; therefore the cordless telephone was within the s.2(c) exclusion and the conviction under s.18(1)(b) could not stand.