27 Oct 2020
香港特別行政區 訴 余天河
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2653
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA210/2019
The Court held there was sufficient evidential basis to conclude, on the CCTV, witness testimony and surrounding circumstances, that the appellant used his mouth to wet the complainant's jeans at the identified spot; the trial judge's credibility findings and inference were permissible and the conviction and 12‑month probation order were safe and must be affirmed.